Tannersville Leaders React to Village Government Staying
Mayoral Reaction
“It’s time for us to move forward and move on and work to make Tannersville a vibrant and exciting community for everyone,” said Mayor David Schneider.
Trustee’s Response
Despite the unofficial results, Trustee George Kelly is not ready to move on like this never happened. “The vote was an embarrassment. It was a mandate. The people that pushed this dissolution got their heads handed to them. It’s a stain on Tannersville and I’m asking for anybody that promoted this dissolution process, any politician, I’m asking for their resignations.”
Background on the Vote
According to unofficial Village results, the vote was 58 yes and 207 no. This means that the village government will not be dissolved. Mayor Schneider had stated that if the Village dissolved, it would save taxpayers around $100 every year. Many Village employees could transfer into the Town of Hunter and most services in the area are already being shared by the two municipalities.
Previous Mayor’s Opinion
Previous Mayor Dr. Lee McGunnigle was also against the proposal. He thought there was no reason for the Village to consider dissolving. “The Village was very fiscally sound, had plenty of money on hand and there was no duplication of services.”
Looking to the Future
With the vote over, Mayor Schneider is looking toward the future. “We have a solar project that was brought to us about three years ago. We finally got the contract from the State. We have Upper Lake Park which is brought back and grown and going to be finished by spring.”
Election Ahead
Village positions, including the mayor’s seat, will be up for election this March. Both the current and previous mayors are expected to run.
Related News
- First place Saratoga skates past Burnt Hills/Ballston Spa in 7-1 win
- Albany Academy rolls past La Salle 88-53
- Local musician loses everything in Palisades fire
- Drug treatment counselor accused of selling narcotics
- Great Barrington holds public hearing on proposed bridge replacement
Conclusion
The village government’s decision to stay has been met with mixed reactions from leaders. While some are looking forward to the future, others are disappointed and feel that the vote was a mandate against those who pushed for dissolution. The village will now move forward with its current government and plans for the future.
FAQs
* Q: What was the outcome of the vote?
A: The vote was 58 yes and 207 no, meaning the village government will not be dissolved.
* Q: What were the reasons for the vote?
A: The village officials stated that dissolving the village would save taxpayers around $100 every year, and many Village employees could transfer into the Town of Hunter, as most services are already being shared by the two municipalities.
* Q: What is the future plan for the village?
A: The mayor is looking forward to implementing a solar project and finishing Upper Lake Park, which is expected to be completed by spring.
* Q: When are the next village elections?
A: Village positions, including the mayor’s seat, will be up for election this March, with both the current and previous mayors expected to run.
