{"id":15366,"date":"2025-05-23T07:14:13","date_gmt":"2025-05-23T11:14:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/?p=15366"},"modified":"2025-05-23T07:14:13","modified_gmt":"2025-05-23T11:14:13","slug":"oklahoma-catholic-school-vetoed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/2025\/05\/23\/oklahoma-catholic-school-vetoed\/","title":{"rendered":"Oklahoma Catholic School Vetoed"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Supreme Court Tie Blocks Oklahoma Taxpayer Funded Catholic Charter School<\/h1>\n<h2>Introduction to the Case<\/h2>\n<p>The Supreme Court on Thursday effectively ended a publicly funded Catholic charter school in Oklahoma, dividing 4-4. The outcome keeps in place an Oklahoma court decision that invalidated a vote by a state charter school board to approve the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, which would have been the nation\u2019s first religious charter school. But it leaves the issue unresolved nationally.<\/p>\n<h2>Background of the Case<\/h2>\n<p>The one-sentence notice from the court provides an unsatisfying end to one of the term\u2019s most closely watched cases. The Catholic Church in Oklahoma had wanted taxpayers to fund the online charter school \u201cfaithful to the teachings of Jesus Christ.\u201d Opponents warned that allowing it would blur the separation between church and state, sap money from public schools and possibly upend the rules governing charter schools in almost every state.<\/p>\n<h3>The Court&#8217;s Decision<\/h3>\n<p>Only eight of the nine justices took part in the case. Justice Amy Coney Barrett didn\u2019t explain her absence, but she is good friends and used to teach with Notre Dame law professor Nicole Garnett, who has been an adviser to the school. The issue could return to the high court in the future, with the prospect that all nine justices could participate. The court, following its custom, did not provide a breakdown of the votes. But during arguments last month, four conservative justices seemed likely to side with the school, while the three liberals seemed just as firmly on the other side.<\/p>\n<h4>Implications of the Decision<\/h4>\n<p>That left Chief Justice John Roberts appearing to hold the key vote, and suggests he went with the liberals to make the outcome 4-4. The case came to the court amid efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Those include a challenged Louisiana requirement that the Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms and a mandate from Oklahoma\u2019s state schools superintendent that the Bible be placed in public school classrooms. St. Isidore, a K-12 online school, had planned to start classes for its first 200 enrollees last fall, with part of its mission to evangelize its students in the Catholic faith.<\/p>\n<h3>Reactions to the Decision<\/h3>\n<p>A key unresolved issue is whether the school is public or private. Charter schools are deemed public in Oklahoma and the other 45 states and the District of Columbia where they operate. North Dakota recently enacted legislation allowing for charter schools. They are free and open to all, receive state funding, abide by antidiscrimination laws and submit to oversight of curriculum and testing. But they also are run by independent boards that are not part of local public school systems. Proponents of publicly funded religious charter schools were quick to point out that the decision was limited to Oklahoma.<\/p>\n<h4>Statements from Parties Involved<\/h4>\n<p>\u201cOklahoma parents and children are better off with more educational choices, not fewer. While the Supreme Court\u2019s order is disappointing for educational freedom, the 4-4 decision does not set precedent, allowing the court to revisit this issue in the future,\u201d said Jim Campbell, who argued the case at the high court on behalf of Oklahoma\u2019s charter school board. Campbell is the chief legal counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal organization that appears often at the court in cases on high-profile social issues. On the other side, the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State applauded the outcome for preserving public education.<\/p>\n<h5>Official Responses<\/h5>\n<p>\u201cThe very idea of a religious public school is a constitutional oxymoron. The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling affirms that a religious school can\u2019t be a public school and a public school can\u2019t be religious,\u201d said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU\u2019s Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. The ACLU represents parents and other opponents of the school who filed a separate lawsuit to block it. Oklahoma officials also offered differing views. Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt and state School Superintendent Ryan Walters said the fight is far from over. \u201cThere will be another case just like this one and Justice Barrett will break the tie,\u201d Stitt said.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s tie decision has effectively blocked the establishment of a taxpayer-funded Catholic charter school in Oklahoma, but the issue remains unresolved at the national level. The case highlights the ongoing debate about the separation of church and state in public education and the role of charter schools in the US education system. As the case may return to the high court in the future, it is likely that the issue will continue to be a topic of controversy and discussion.<\/p>\n<h2>FAQs<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>What was the outcome of the Supreme Court case regarding the Oklahoma taxpayer-funded Catholic charter school?\n<ul>\n<li>The Supreme Court divided 4-4, effectively ending the publicly funded Catholic charter school in Oklahoma.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Why did Justice Amy Coney Barrett not participate in the case?\n<ul>\n<li>Justice Amy Coney Barrett didn\u2019t explain her absence, but she is good friends and used to teach with Notre Dame law professor Nicole Garnett, who has been an adviser to the school.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>What are the implications of the decision for the future of charter schools?\n<ul>\n<li>The decision leaves the issue unresolved nationally, and the case may return to the high court in the future with the prospect that all nine justices could participate.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>How did the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) respond to the decision?\n<ul>\n<li>The ACLU applauded the outcome for preserving public education, stating that the decision affirms that a religious school can\u2019t be a public school and a public school can\u2019t be religious.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>What is the next step for the proponents of publicly funded religious charter schools?\n<ul>\n<li>Proponents of publicly funded religious charter schools were quick to point out that the decision was limited to Oklahoma, and they may continue to pursue similar cases in other states.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court Tie Blocks Oklahoma Taxpayer Funded Catholic Charter School Introduction to the Case The Supreme Court on Thursday effectively ended a publicly funded Catholic charter school in Oklahoma, dividing 4-4. The outcome keeps in place an Oklahoma court decision that invalidated a vote by a state charter school board to approve the St. Isidore [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":15367,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-15366","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-education"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.sun-sentinel.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme_Court_79958_1c1bd0-1.jpg?w=1400px&strip=all&w=1400&resize=1400,959&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15366"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15366"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15368,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15366\/revisions\/15368"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citystuff.com\/miami\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}