Friday, October 3, 2025

CPAC Ejects Enrique Tarrio and Other Jan. 6 Defendants, Then Does a 180

Must read

CPAC Ejects Enrique Tarrio and Other Jan. 6 Defendants, Then Does a 180

Initial Ejection

On Wednesday, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland, ejected several individuals associated with the January 6 insurrection, including Miami Proud Boy Enrique Tarrio and other pardoned January 6 defendants. The list of ejected individuals included Jake Lang, Oathkeepers founder Stewart Rhodes, Adam Villarreal, Richard “Bigo” Barnett, Rachel Myers, Tarrio, and fellow Proud Boy Dominic Pezzola.

Quick Reversal

However, it appears that CPAC has since reversed course, allowing some of the originally ejected individuals to rejoin the event. According to a @J6PatriotNews post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, the organization has reinstated some of the previously ejected individuals.

Why the Reversal?

It is unclear what led to CPAC’s sudden change of heart. However, it is possible that the organization faced pressure from the individuals and their supporters to reconsider its decision. Alternatively, CPAC may have decided to pivot in an effort to rebrand itself as a more inclusive and tolerant organization.

Conclusion

The swift reversal by CPAC has left many wondering about the true nature of the organization. While it may have initially taken a strong stance against those associated with the January 6 insurrection, its decision to allow some of those individuals to rejoin the event raises questions about its commitment to its original principles.

FAQs

* Q: Why did CPAC eject Enrique Tarrio and other January 6 defendants?
A: CPAC initially ejected Tarrio and other January 6 defendants due to their involvement in the insurrection.
* Q: Why did CPAC reverse its decision?
A: It is unclear why CPAC reversed its decision, but it may have been due to pressure from the individuals and their supporters or an effort to rebrand itself as a more inclusive organization.
* Q: What does this mean for the future of CPAC?
A: The reversal raises questions about the organization’s commitment to its original principles and its willingness to stand by its initial decisions.

- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest article