Introduction to the Problem
Los Angeles just can’t get a break. The latest embarrassment is LA28 chair Casey Wasserman, the man tasked with making sure the 2028 Summer Olympics are a massive success. At a news conference this week announcing that President Trump will head a federal Olympics task force, Wasserman offered L.A. a giant whoopie cushion.
The Issue with Trump’s Involvement
With Wasserman at his left side, Trump vowed to bring L.A. “back stronger than ever.” On Trump’s right was a rash of L.A. haters, some of whom played a prominent role in Southern California’s summer of deportations, including Vice President JD Vance and Department of Homeland Security head Kristi Noem. Not present, but hailed by Trump during the presser as an “MVP candidate,” was Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who has made it his life’s mission to crush the multicultural metropolis that birthed him.
Wasserman’s Response
So what did Wasserman, a prominent Democratic donor who in recent months has thrown some cash at Republican committees, do in front of people who want to rain holy hell on his hometown? He praised Trump’s “support” of the L.A. Olympics as “truly extraordinary” and gifted him a set of medals from the 1984 Games hosted by the city. If that wasn’t groveling enough, Wasserman was grinning after Trump joked about not using an autopen to sign the executive order creating the task force — a jab at President Biden.
The Potential Consequences
The federal government was always going to play a role in providing security for the 2028 Olympics, just as it has for previous Games in the U.S. But Trump, as the head of the task force, now gets to personally oversee our own siege. When asked by a reporter if he would deploy the military to L.A. the way he did this summer, Trump responded, “We’ll do anything necessary to keep the Olympics safe, including using our National Guard or military, OK?” With the Games happening in a presidential election year, Trump would love nothing more than to traipse around an L.A. radically transformed by his deportation blitzkrieg to proclaim his mission accomplished and broadcast his conquest to the world.
Why L.A. Should Withdraw from Hosting the Olympics
That’s why L.A. needs to withdraw from hosting the Olympics — the sooner the better. Trump’s news conference, where he also called Mayor Karen Bass “not very competent,” looked like a preview of what we can expect in the lead-up to the Games. Angelenos: Do you really want to give Trump and his goon squad more chances to make life miserable for you? You don’t stand idly by as your sworn enemy assumes even more power to mess with you — you toss that problem elsewhere if you can.
The Financial Burden
In a city that has long faced existential problems, the idea of staging such a spectacle always sat uneasy with me. Boosters have drowned out skeptics by insisting that the Olympics will help the city and come at “no cost” to taxpayers. But the city government will have to cover the first $270 million of any cost overruns or revenue shortfalls — and where on earth would that money come from? Indeed, few Olympics ever turn a profit. The organizing committee behind last year’s Paris Games claimed to have brought in about $30 million — which isn’t bad, but it’s just 3% of the nearly billion-dollar budget deficit that the city of L.A. faced at the beginning of the year.
The Alternative
Expecting the Olympics to be a financial and spiritual salvation for the city betrays Angelenos’ lack of trust in their ability to save themselves. Nevertheless, an executive for the tourism group Visit California said at a state Senate committee hearing last month that hosting the Games would present a “refreshed global image of California as the most welcoming destination in the nation.” The city doesn’t need a multibillion-dollar ad campaign to let the world know how cool it is or make it believe in itself. It needs people committed to solving problems for those who have to live with them daily — not for tourists and visiting athletes.
Precedent for Withdrawal
Supporters will whine that pulling out of the Olympics at this point is a huge inconvenience and will wreck L.A.’s global standing. But withdrawing from a commitment to host a huge sporting event isn’t unprecedented. Denver dumped the 1976 Winter Olympics three years and three months before they were set to open, and its reputation came out just fine. Mexico hosted the 1986 World Cup after Colombia pulled out three years earlier.
Conclusion
By passing on the Olympics, L.A. officials can set aside their concerns about whether producing a month’s worth of seven Super Bowls a day, as Wasserman loves to boast, will strain city resources. Wasserman and his band of the best and the brightest can focus on what L.A. really needs, not how to transform SoFi Stadium into an aquatics center. I write this as a huge Olympics fan who watches the opening ceremony every four years, the Games’ problems be damned. But I don’t want my money going toward something that Trump will use to bolster his noxious legacy.
FAQs
Q: What is the main reason for L.A. to withdraw from hosting the Olympics?
A: The main reason is Trump’s involvement and the potential consequences of his actions on the city.
Q: What is the financial burden of hosting the Olympics?
A: The city government will have to cover the first $270 million of any cost overruns or revenue shortfalls.
Q: Is withdrawing from hosting the Olympics unprecedented?
A: No, Denver dumped the 1976 Winter Olympics and Mexico hosted the 1986 World Cup after Colombia pulled out.
Q: What can L.A. officials focus on instead of the Olympics?
A: They can focus on solving the city’s problems and addressing the needs of its residents.
Q: Why is the author opposed to the Olympics?
A: The author is opposed to the Olympics because they don’t want to support an event that Trump will use to bolster his legacy and potentially harm the city.
