Tuesday, October 14, 2025

Fired workers reinstated at NOAA amid storm chaos

Must read

Introduction to the Situation

Workers at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have experienced a kind of whiplash as the federal government tried to reinstate probationary employees who had been fired. More than 600 NOAA workers were laid off more than two weeks ago, including some in public safety roles, such as scientists who issue tsunami alerts, hurricane-hunting flight directors, and meteorologists in local forecast offices.

Background on the Layoffs

The layoffs came just weeks before a severe storm raced across the country, spawning tornadoes and killing at least 42 people. The National Weather Service, a division of NOAA, forecast the storm, issuing public alerts that it would be a “particularly dangerous event.” The cuts included weather balloon launches in Albany, New York; Gray, Maine; and Kotzebue, Alaska, that are critical to support accurate forecasting. The agency also closed several offices.

Reinstatement and Confusion

But Thursday, a U.S. district judge in Maryland issued a temporary restraining order, blocking (at least temporarily) the terminations of tens of thousands of workers across agencies and ordering them to be reinstated. The Trump administration said in court Monday that it had moved to reinstate about 24,000 workers affected by the widespread cuts to the federal government’s probationary workforce. In a court filing, the Commerce Department confirmed that it had reinstated 791 workers, in total, across its agencies, including NOAA.

Impact on NOAA Workers

Although the probationary workers at NOAA have technically been reinstated, they were placed on administrative leave and have not been asked to return to work. So it is not immediately clear whether the services they previously contributed to would be restored. Andy Hazelton, a hurricane modeling specialist with a doctorate who was laid off late last month, said he received an email Monday with a memorandum confirming he had been reinstated following the court action. Hazelton said that as of Monday, he had received no additional communication and remained unsure whether he would receive back pay or eventually return to his duties.

Rumors of Further Cuts

The email brought temporary relief, he said, but confusion remains because he has also heard rumors that there may be additional cuts to the NOAA workforce through a reduction in force, or RIF. Indeed, rumors have circulated widely about possible layoffs at NOAA. At a news conference last week held by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., a member of the Appropriations subcommittee on Commerce and other programs, Rick Spinrad, the NOAA administrator during President Joe Biden’s administration, made some details of those rumors public. “NOAA was forced to identify an additional 1,029 positions” for potential termination, Spinrad said, adding that he had been told about the potential cuts by former colleagues still at the agency.

Reaction from Affected Workers

Dennis Jaszka, who worked as an investigative support technician for NOAA’s office of law enforcement before he was laid off, said he received an identical email to Hazelton’s. Jaszka, 49, said he now feels “in complete limbo.” He resents the implication that government workers are a drain on taxpayer resources and the statements President Donald Trump has made suggesting that they do not do good work, or any work at all. “It took me a lot of time to get this job, and then I finally get it, and then this administration comes in and says, basically, ‘You government workers are cockroaches.’ That’s not what they said, but it’s kind of the idea: ‘You just steal our tax money and you don’t do anything,’” Jaszka said.

Reasoning Behind Not Returning to Work

In a court filing, the Commerce Department said it did not ask employees to return to full duty because that would be a burden on the agency and cause turmoil for terminated employees. “All employees offered reinstatement into full duty status would have to be onboarded again, including going through any applicable training, filling out human resources paperwork, obtaining new security badges, re-enrolling in benefits programs and payroll, reinstituting applicable security clearance actions, receiving government furnished equipment, and other requisite administrative actions,” Jessica Palatka, the department’s chief human capital officer, wrote in a court filing.

Conclusion

The situation at NOAA remains uncertain, with reinstated workers on administrative leave and the possibility of further cuts looming. The impact on the agency’s ability to provide critical services, such as weather forecasting, is a concern. As the court case continues, the fate of these workers and the future of NOAA’s operations hang in the balance.

FAQs

  • Q: How many NOAA workers were laid off initially?
    • A: More than 600 NOAA workers were laid off.
  • Q: What was the reason for the layoffs?
    • A: The reason for the layoffs is part of broader cuts to the federal government’s probationary workforce.
  • Q: What is the current status of the reinstated workers?
    • A: The reinstated workers have been placed on administrative leave and have not been asked to return to work.
  • Q: Are there rumors of further cuts at NOAA?
    • A: Yes, there are rumors of potential additional cuts through a reduction in force (RIF).
  • Q: How do the affected workers feel about the situation?
    • A: The workers feel uncertain and confused, with some resenting the implication that government workers are not valuable.
- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest article