California Sues Trump Administration Over Homeless Housing Cuts
Introduction to the Lawsuit
California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta sued the Trump administration seeking to stop a federal policy change that advocates say could force 170,000 formerly homeless Americans back on the streets or into shelters. The lawsuit focuses on a federal program known as Continuum of Care that sends money to local governments and nonprofits to fight homelessness.
The Continuum of Care Program
This month, the Trump administration announced it was drastically cutting the amount of money the program will pay for rental subsidies in permanent housing and shifting those dollars to temporary housing and services instead. With subsidies for permanent housing reduced, advocates say 170,000 people could return to homelessness. Locally, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority has warned 5,000 L.A. County households, containing 6,800 people, could be at risk of losing their homes, which would erase the small decline in homelessness reported this year.
Response from the Trump Administration
In a statement, a HUD spokesperson called the lawsuit “meritless” and said the department stands by its changes, which are designed to fix failed Biden administration homeless assistance policies, including one known as Housing First. That policy, first put in place at the federal level under President George W. Bush, puts people into permanent housing without requiring they also be enrolled in programs such as drug or mental health treatment, though permanent housing sites often offer those services on a voluntary basis.
Details of the Policy Change
This month, HUD said its policy change “restores accountability to homelessness programs and promotes self-sufficiency among vulnerable Americans” in part by redirecting most money to transitional housing and supportive services that it sees as more effective than permanent housing. Bonta filed the lawsuit along with 19 state attorneys general and two governors.
Allegations in the Lawsuit
The lawsuit alleges the HUD policy change violated the law in several ways, including that the department failed to properly notice the change and that the new restrictions on funding violate the separation of powers because they were not imposed by Congress. In addition to capping the amount of funds that can be spent on permanent housing, HUD is requiring more total homeless dollars be subject to competitive bidding. Bonta’s office said the new rules also “eliminate funding to applicants that acknowledge the existence of transgender and gender-diverse people” and make it harder for cities and counties to get funding if they don’t “enforce certain policies this Administration favors, like bans on public camping.”
Conclusion
The lawsuit highlights the ongoing debate over how to address homelessness in the United States. While the Trump administration argues that its policy changes are necessary to promote self-sufficiency and accountability, advocates and state officials like Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta contend that these changes will only exacerbate the problem. The outcome of this lawsuit will have significant implications for the thousands of individuals and families who rely on these programs for housing and support.
FAQs
Q: What is the Continuum of Care program?
A: The Continuum of Care program is a federal program that provides funding to local governments and nonprofits to fight homelessness.
Q: How many people could be affected by the policy change?
A: According to advocates, 170,000 people could return to homelessness due to the reduction in subsidies for permanent housing.
Q: What is the Housing First policy?
A: The Housing First policy puts people into permanent housing without requiring them to also be enrolled in programs such as drug or mental health treatment.
Q: Why did the Trump administration make these policy changes?
A: The Trump administration claims the changes are designed to fix failed homeless assistance policies and promote self-sufficiency among vulnerable Americans.
Q: What are the allegations in the lawsuit filed by California and other states?
A: The lawsuit alleges that the HUD policy change violated the law by failing to properly notice the change and by imposing new restrictions on funding that were not imposed by Congress.
