Introduction to the Conflict
WASHINGTON — As Gov. Gavin Newsom and the University of California consider whether to sue the Trump administration to restore more than half a billion dollars in federal grants to UCLA, the White House on Tuesday had a terse response.
The White House Response
“Bring it on, Gavin,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt when asked about Newsom’s opposition to a Trump plan demanding more than $1 billion and sweeping campus changes at UCLA to resolve federal antisemitism findings against the university. “This administration is well within its legal right to do this, and we want to ensure that our colleges and our universities are respecting the 1st Amendment rights and the religious liberties of students on their campuses and UCLA has failed to do that, and I have a whole list of examples that I will forward to Gavin Newsom’s press office, if he hasn’t seen them himself,” Leavitt said.
Background of the Conflict
The statement was the first public comment from the White House about the high-stakes conflict between the nation’s premier public university system and the Trump administration, which has accused UCLA of violating the civil rights of Jewish students, illegally considering race in admissions and treating transgender people in sports, healthcare and campus life in ways that the government claims hinder women’s rights. Leavitt spoke after a question from The Times about how Trump would respond to Newsom’s comments late last week that the settlement offer for UCLA was “extortion” and “ransom.” “We’ll sue,” Newsom said Friday.
Reaction from Newsom’s Office
Responding to Leavitt’s comments, a Newsom spokesperson pointed The Times to a meme posted on X after the news conference. “Glorious leader is entitled to all treasures of the realm, especially from universities,” said the post from Newsom’s press office account. The graphic features an image of what appears to a be a North Korean news anchor with a North Korean flag in the background. In an earlier joint statement with California legislative leaders, Newsom said that the action against UCLA “isn’t about protecting Jewish students — it’s a billion-dollar political shakedown from the pay-to-play president. Trump has weaponized the Department of Justice to punish California, crush free thinking, and kneecap the greatest public university system in the world.”
Potential Legal Action
No lawsuit has been filed and the UC Board of Regents, which held an emergency meeting Monday afternoon over the grant cuts, has not announced how it will proceed aside from calling Trump’s current terms “unacceptable.” Newsom sits as a voting member on the 24-person board, has appointed several of its members and can wield influence on the body, although the final decision on a lawsuit or settlement rests with the regents. Newsom did not attend Monday’s meeting.
Impact on UCLA
In a statement after the meeting, a UC spokesperson said the $1-billion price tag would be “devastating.” “UC’s leadership spent recent days evaluating the demand, updating the UC community, and engaging with stakeholders,” said Meredith Turner, UC senior vice president of external relations. “Our focus remains on protecting students’ access to a UC education and promoting the academic freedom, excellence, and innovation that have always been at the heart of UC’s work.” Hundreds of grants — from the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health and Department of Energy — are on hold at UCLA. The money funds research into cancer, math, brain science and other areas, and helps pay for graduate student stipends and tuition as well as lab upkeep. If the freezes stay for the long term, administrators are considering layoffs and other budget reductions.
Allegations Against UCLA
Citing the reasons for the freezes, a July 30 NSF letter to UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk alleged UCLA “engages in racism, in the form of illegal affirmative action, UCLA fails to promote a research environment free of antisemitism and bias; UCLA discriminates against and endangers women by allowing men in women’s sports and private women-only spaces.” Frenk, in a campuswide message the next day, disputed the funding halt. “This far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination,” he wrote.
Conclusion
The conflict between the Trump administration and UCLA, facilitated by Governor Gavin Newsom’s opposition, marks a significant escalation in the debate over university policies, federal funding, and the balance between free speech and discrimination on campuses. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen whether a lawsuit will be filed, and how the UC Board of Regents will navigate the complex legal and political landscape.
FAQs
- Q: What is the basis of the Trump administration’s demand for over $1 billion from UCLA?
A: The demand is based on allegations that UCLA violates the civil rights of Jewish students, considers race in admissions illegally, and discriminates against women by allowing men in women’s sports and private women-only spaces. - Q: How has Governor Gavin Newsom responded to the Trump administration’s demands?
A: Governor Newsom has termed the settlement offer as “extortion” and “ransom” and has indicated a willingness to sue the Trump administration. - Q: What is the potential impact of the grant cuts on UCLA?
A: The cuts could lead to layoffs, budget reductions, and significant disruptions to research and academic programs, including those funded by the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Department of Energy. - Q: Has any legal action been taken yet?
A: No lawsuit has been filed as of the last update, but the UC Board of Regents has called the terms presented by the Trump administration “unacceptable.”
