Introduction to Elon Musk’s Approach
Washington has never seen anything like the rule-breaking, power-taking, government-torching, protocol-scorching force of delighted havoc and gleeful mayhem that is Elon Musk.
Margaret O’Mara has.
The University of Washington historian charted the spectacular rise and all-swallowing influence of the tech industry and its titans in her excellent, highly readable 2019 work, “The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America.”
Musk, who grew rich by age 30 through his start-up work, is a relatively small character in the book, for reasons of narrative and focus. Instead, O’Mara centered her history on the founders and back stories of the major platform companies: Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft.
The Silicon Valley Mindset
But there’s an attitude, a worldview and a fundamental set of principles that guide the tech industry and its progeny, like a secular catechism. O’Mara sees those beliefs very much in evidence at Musk’s fancifully named Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, and his wrecking-ball efforts to raze huge swaths of the federal government in a single, unfettered swoop.
Several elements are present and accounted for.
The “techno optimism,” as O’Mara described it, with its unshakable faith that technology is inherently good and will improve things — “even if there might be some collateral damage along the way.” The drive to move quickly and scale rapidly, if recklessly. The importance of personal relationships, such as the transactional bromance between President Trump and Musk, who spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to put his ally back in the Oval Office.
The Role of Government in Silicon Valley’s Success
O’Mara’s book explains how the federal government built Silicon Valley, a fact many of its entrepreneurs and legends — basking in the reflection of their self-glorification — choose to ignore, or fail to understand. “That’s actually part of the secret,” O’Mara said. “The indirect nature of the spending, the fact that it’s flowing through universities and private companies in way that is kind of stealthy and hidden.”
Of course, there was a profusion of great minds in California’s fertile Santa Clara Valley, innovators and visionaries blessed with a superhuman capacity to peer around corners and deep into the future. All that brainpower would have been for naught, however, save for the beneficence of Uncle Sam. As a customer. A subsidizer of research. A producer of human capital, through generous education funding. As an angel investor.
The Impact of Silicon Valley’s Mentality on Government
Call it ignorance or arrogance, there’s a deeply embedded notion in Silicon Valley and many of its denizens that because government is not market-driven “it is, by definition, stodgy and inefficient and wasteful and corrupt,” O’Mara said. They think that people working in government “aren’t very smart. The smart people all go to work in business.”
That mentality goes a long way toward explaining the meat-ax approach Musk has applied, with Trump’s encouragement, to whole agencies and federal programs. Doubtless, there is waste, fraud and abuse that could be thoughtfully and deliberately carved out. Government is, after all, a human endeavor.
The Limitations of Applying Silicon Valley’s Approach to Government
But the wantonness of DOGE destruction, the bloodletting, the undifferentiated firing of federal employees en masse is not a bug, as they say in software development. It’s a feature.
“Elon’s sort of taking what he did at Twitter” — an initial step was firing 80% of the workforce — “and attempting to port it over to the federal government,” O’Mara said. But the federal government “is not a small- to medium-sized, unprofitable social media company. And the jury is still out on whether that was actually an effective way to manage Twitter.”
Conclusion
There is a trope, favored by the politically facile, that government should operate more like a business. But that’s a cheap hustle. Business and government have different constituencies and divergent functions. Government can’t pick and choose those it serves, or write off portions of the country based on a cost-benefit analysis. If it did, to use but one example, there goes your rural mail delivery.
“Could you make things more efficient? Could you get people’s tax refunds out faster, and all those things?” O’Mara asked. “Yes, but oftentimes that requires more government, not less. More human capital, more technology, more investment.”
The desire for high services at low cost — put another way, a free lunch — is a contradiction and a conundrum that Americans have wrestled with since the country’s founding, long before there were competing Democratic and Republican parties.
And now Elon Musk is supposed to be the solution?
Heaven help us all.
FAQs
Q: What is the main idea of Margaret O’Mara’s book "The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America"?
A: The book explores the history of Silicon Valley and its rise to prominence, highlighting the role of government in its success.
Q: What is the "techno optimism" mentioned in the article?
A: The "techno optimism" refers to the unshakable faith that technology is inherently good and will improve things, even if there might be some collateral damage along the way.
Q: How does the Silicon Valley mentality view government?
A: The Silicon Valley mentality views government as stodgy, inefficient, wasteful, and corrupt, and believes that people working in government are not as smart as those in the private sector.
Q: What is the limitation of applying the Silicon Valley approach to government?
A: The federal government is not a small- to medium-sized, unprofitable social media company, and the approach that works for Twitter may not work for the federal government.
Q: What is the conclusion of the article?
A: The article concludes that government and business have different constituencies and functions, and that the desire for high services at low cost is a contradiction that Americans have wrestled with since the country’s founding.
