USDA Withdraws Plan to Reduce Salmonella in Poultry

The Agriculture Department will not require poultry companies to limit salmonella bacteria in their products, halting a Biden Administration safety effort to prevent food poisoning from contaminated meat.

The department on Thursday said it was withdrawing a rule proposed in August after three years of development. Officials with the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service cited feedback from more than 7,000 public comments and said they would “evaluate whether it should update” current salmonella regulations.

Background on the Withdrawn Rule

According to NBC News, the department also said the new rule would have created “significant financial and operational burdens on American businesses and consumers."

How Would the Rule Have Impacted Salmonella Testing?

The rule would have required poultry companies to keep levels of salmonella bacteria under a certain threshold and test for the presence of six strains most associated with illness, including three found in turkey and three in chicken. If the levels exceeded the standard or any of those strains were found, the poultry couldn’t be sold and would be subject to recall, the proposal had said.

The plan aimed to reduce an estimated 125,000 salmonella infections from chicken and 43,000 from turkey each year, according to USDA. Overall, salmonella causes 1.35 million infections a year, most through food, and about 420 deaths, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Reaction from Industry and Supporters

The withdrawal drew praise from the National Chicken Council, an industry trade group, which said the proposed rule was legally unsound, misinterpreted science, would have increased costs and create more food waste, all “with no meaningful impact on public health.”
“We remain committed to further reducing salmonella and fully support food safety regulations and policies that are based on sound science,” said Ashley Peterson, the group’s senior vice president of science and regulatory affairs.

The Meat Institute, a trade group representing meat and poultry processors, had also commented on the rule, appealing to President Donald Trump to withdraw the proposal and put forward a different one, describing it as among the “costly and burdensome” steps taken by the Biden administration.

Food Safety Advocates’ Response

The move drew swift criticism from food safety advocates, including Sandra Eskin, a former USDA official who helped draft the plan.
The withdrawal “sends the clear message that the Make America Healthy Again initiative does not care about the thousands of people who get sick from preventable foodborne salmonella infections linked to poultry,” Eskin said in a statement.

The proposed rule had been regarded as a food safety victory similar to a 1994 decision to ban certain strains of dangerous E. coli bacteria from ground beef after deadly outbreaks, said Sarah Sorscher, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
“Make no mistake: Shipping more salmonella to restaurants and grocery stores is certain to make Americans sicker,” Sorscher said.

Recent Developments in Salmonella Regulation

Earlier this month, the USDA said it would delay by six months the enforcement of a final rule regulating salmonella levels in certain breaded and stuffed raw chicken products. Enforcement, which was set for May 1, now begins Nov. 3.
That covers foods such as frozen chicken cordon bleu and chicken Kiev dishes that appear to be fully cooked but are only heat-treated to set the batter or coating. Such products have been linked to at least 14 salmonella outbreaks and at least 200 illnesses since 1998, according to the CDC.

Conclusion

The decision to withdraw the proposed rule on reducing salmonella in poultry has significant implications for public health and the poultry industry. While industry groups have praised the move, food safety advocates have expressed concern over the potential increase in foodborne illnesses.

FAQs

• Q: What was the proposed rule about?
  A: The proposed rule aimed to reduce salmonella bacteria in poultry products by setting a certain threshold for salmonella levels and testing for specific strains associated with illness.
• Q: Why was the rule withdrawn?
  A: The rule was withdrawn due to feedback from over 7,000 public comments and concerns over financial and operational burdens on businesses and consumers.
• Q: What are the implications of withdrawing the rule?
  A: The withdrawal may lead to an increased risk of salmonella infections from poultry products, as the proposed rule aimed to reduce an estimated 125,000 salmonella infections from chicken and 43,000 from turkey each year.
• Q: What do food safety advocates say about the withdrawal?
  A: Food safety advocates criticize the move, stating it will lead to more Americans getting sick from preventable foodborne salmonella infections linked to poultry.