Closing Arguments Continue in Madigan Corruption Trial
Prosecutors Emphasize Key Phone Call in Day 2 of Closing Arguments
Prosecutors in the corruption trial of former Illinois Speaker of the House Michael Madigan and longtime political advisor Michael McClain continued to present their case, arguing that the two men used their positions to further their own interests and enrich themselves.
According to Assistant State’s Attorney Diane MacArthur, Madigan and McClain ran public and private operations like an enterprise, engaging in a range of illegal activities, including bribery, racketeering, and wire fraud.
Prosecutors Focus on Power and Profit
The prosecution’s argument is centered around the idea that Madigan and McClain’s actions were driven by a desire for power and profit. MacArthur emphasized that the duo used their positions to reward allies, workers, and associates for their loyalty, and to generate income through illegal activities.
Prosecutors Present Evidence of Madigan’s Abuse of Power
The government presented evidence of Madigan’s abuse of power, including his use of his position as Chairman of the Democratic Party of Illinois to influence legislators and provide or withhold funds for their campaigns. They also played recordings of phone calls, including one in which McClain identified himself as an agent of Madigan.
Prosecutors Argue Madigan’s Relationship with Star Witness Was Transactional
The prosecution also argued that Madigan’s relationship with star witness Danny Solis, a former 25th Ward alderman, was transactional, with Madigan agreeing to help Solis pursue a state board appointment in exchange for personal gain for his law firm.
Defense Team Begins Closing Arguments
Madigan’s defense team, led by attorney Daniel Collins, countered by painting Madigan as a family man who looked out for his neighbors and worked for the people he served with their best interests in mind. Collins argued that even if the prosecution brought in 100 more witnesses, their evidence would still fail, and that Madigan was not guilty of the crimes charged.
Conclusion
The trial is expected to continue with the defense team presenting their closing arguments and the government’s rebuttal case before being sent to the jury for deliberation.
FAQs
* Who is Michael Madigan?
+ Michael Madigan is the former Speaker of the House of the Illinois General Assembly.
* What are the charges against Madigan and McClain?
+ The two are charged with bribery, racketeering, wire fraud, and other crimes.
* What is the alleged scheme involving AT&T Illinois and former State Rep. Eddie Acevedo’s contract?
+ The prosecution claims that Madigan and McClain were involved in a scheme to award a contract to AT&T Illinois in exchange for bribes, with Acevedo serving as the middleman.
